How To Learn Anything Faster Than Everyone Else
In a Nutshell
Alex Hormozi shares 12 rules of thumb for business success, including 80%+ close rates signal 3-4x underpricing, 3:1 to 12:1 LTV:CAC ratios based on human involvement, 70% sales calendar utilization, 30-day payback periods, 80%+ gross margins, and ignoring industry averages to win big. He stresses conscious trade-offs in life/business (e.g., no beachfront ski house) to achieve outsized results, as fearing certain losses blocks unknown upsides. To learn anything fast, deconstruct skills into observable sub-behaviors, quantify success, ignore black-box psychology, replicate top performers' actions via high-volume first-party data iterations, and repeat relentlessly—intelligence is iteration speed.
These notes were generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies.
We're live on a Monday. Greetings from New Jersey, America, Littykitty, claims department, Poland, Paco, David from Israel, Nigeria, Alex from Canada, Alexis from North Carolina, Arizona, Utah, Kenya, Chicago, Germany, UK, Oscar, Russia, Las Vegas.
Three separate topics: 1) Rules of thumb ratios for business assessment. 2) Trade-offs for goal achievement, mostly business-related but applicable broadly. 3) Mystery surprise topic.
12 important rules of thumb from 14 years in business. acquisition.com portfolio does over $250 million per year. Nine weeks ago, $106 million in sales, Guinness fastest selling non-fiction book, doubled formal record. Use to analyze business, allocate time with yes/no answers on performance.
For sales with salesperson in person, phones, or Zoom. Tier ladder:
- 80%+ close rate (4/5 buy): underpriced by 3-4x.
- 60-80% (3-4/5): underpriced by 2-3x (e.g., $100 → $200-$300).
- 50-60%: underpriced by 1.5-2x (e.g., $100 → $150-$200).
- 40-50%: underpriced by 1.25-1.5x (e.g., $100 → $125-$150).
- 30-40%: appropriately priced if proper sales motion (consumer educated pre-purchase, call is personalization). Without proper motion, still 2-3x pricing potential.
- Below 30% (<1/3 buy): avatar issue or sales motion issue; fix those before lowering price.
Exception for unlimited scale businesses like software: balance gross margin (price up) vs growth (price down) to maximize both.
For 80%+ unscalable/service businesses: always raise prices. Virtuous cycle: higher margins → better talent → better reputation. Vicious cycle: lower prices → serve more → lower margins → worse talent/customers.
LTV (lifetime value): gross profit over customer lifetime. CAC (customer acquisition cost): cost to get customer.
Traditional 3:1 for software (5% of businesses). Adjust by humans in process (attraction, conversion, delivery):
- All automated (0 humans, e.g., ads → checkout → SaaS delivery): 3:1.
- 1 human: 6:1 (padding for lumpiness/inconsistency, e.g., new hires underperform).
- 2 humans (e.g., ads → sales call → light delivery): 9:1.
- 3 humans (manual attraction/conversion/delivery): 12:1.
Nail model before scaling. First year Gym Launch: ads (0.5 media), support reps, phone sales → LTV:CAC 100:1 ($100k spent → $10M made). Four career windows >30:1 via arbitrage.
Big companies: low CAC (e.g., Facebook brand → CAC→0) or high LTV (e.g., Salesforce $1-5M/year/enterprise customer). Improve ratio: CAC→0 (brand/viral) or LTV→∞.
For growth: 100 actions/day on first acquisition channel, ideally 100 days (10,000 actions). Gets results; most first customer by week 3. Commit fully (missionary heart).
For bigger businesses: apply to new channels (e.g., from Meta ads → YouTube/Google; reels → new platform; outreach → new medium).
Symptom: volatility (feast/famine). Not inconsistent leads; insufficient volume on small timeline. E.g., 3 customers/month = 1/10 days → do 10 days' advertising daily → 1 sale/day.
Top companies do 30x more advertising for 30x sales. $1-2M businesses: ~450 pieces content/week (volume normalizes outliers).
Producing 25-30,000 pieces of content per year compared to $1 million creators doing about one per day (365 pieces). This yields a thousand times the outcome. Even with diminishing returns, if doing a thousand times more yields a hundred times the outcome, it's still worth it. People mess up by stopping due to diminishing returns per action instead of recognizing continued value. Small business owners focus too much on optimization, getting the most for the least but not the most overall. Those who want the most win.
Call leads within 60 seconds. Slow response means paying four times more per customer, lower close rates, and reduced gross margins. Letting leads cool off allows them to shop competitors, leading to pricing wars. Brian Johnson from Blueprint boils health to resting heart rate before bed; similarly, LTV to CAC is key, with lead response time underpinning it. How you do one thing is how you do everything—dedication to excellence proven in studies. Hiring for fast calls pays off with 4x sales; invest first, then get returns. Reducing CAC by dividing by four via faster responses improves scalability. Attack high-return, low-effort areas first.
Sweet spot for sales team calendars is 70% utilization (range 60-85%, ideally 70-75%). Fully booked (100%) increases sales but drops conversion rates, raising CAC: appointments further out reduce show rates; inconvenient times reduce show rates; no time for outbound or follow-ups (pipeline work). Low utilization (e.g., 30% empty) drops morale, causes commission breath, pressure to close every deal.
- Enough times for prospects to book soon and conveniently (boosts show rates).
- Blank space for salespeople to work pipeline.
High ad weeks with booked calendars yielded same sales as low weeks due to pipeline squeezing in low periods. Constant pipeline work requires more salespeople—hiring more has never reduced revenue. Keep salespeople hungry, below their 'nut,' always striving; add reps to enable better opportunity squeezing rather than changing commissions.
Payback period: time to recover customer acquisition cost (CAC). Target within 30 days, leveraging credit cards' interest-free 30 days for limitless growth without out-of-pocket cash. Repeat infinitely: spend $100 credit, acquire customer, recover $100 by month-end, owe nothing, retain customer.
Even 90-day payback can improve by pulling cash forward via money models (e.g., initiation/setup/onboarding fees, front-end programs, physical product bundles, extended periods, buy-one-get-two, prepay last month). All big businesses recovered CAC in first 30 days. Funded/large/recurring businesses can be more aggressive; bootstrappers (poll: ~96% bootstrapped, 4% investors) should prioritize. Investors love 30-day payback; it eliminates need for funding, boosts leverage. Tactics: initiation fees, setup fees, onboarding, on-ramp, front-end defined program, physical product bundle, extended period bundle, buy one get two, prepay last month.
Gross margin: (price - delivery cost) / price. Dictates business scalability; net margins cannot exceed gross margins. To hit 50% net margins with 50% gross leaves nothing for CAC, overhead, employees, admin.
Small owners undercharge: (1) empathy from own struggles limits growth/helping others; (2) undervalue own service since it's easy for them. Sell on customer value post-problem resolution. Quote Joker: "My father always told me when you're good at something, never do it for free."
Money example (monthly delivery cost $100):
- 80% gross margin: price $500, margin $400.
- 70% gross margin: price ~$333, margin $233.
- 90% gross margin: price $1,000, margin $900.
70% to 90% doubles margin dollars; 60% vs 80% is stratospheric difference. Target minimum 80% gross margins for services (baseline; won't enter <80%). With 80% gross, only 30% left for all else to hit 50% net (rent, admin, insurance, marketing, sales). Applies to service businesses like gyms—achieved 80%+ via pricing. Avoid commoditization (e.g., pink Himalayan salt premium vs regular); brand to differentiate. Book on money models addresses pulling cash forward.
If you're trying to figure out what's wrong with your business, it's usually because your margins are off or you're mispriced. This might be the symptom of a commoditized offer or a sales process that doesn't function properly. To run a high margin business, run exceptionally high gross margins for whatever you sell. For a book on making a decommoditized offer to achieve 80% or higher gross margins, read $100M Offers, which has 27,000 five-star reviews.
This is an add-on to the 30-day payback period. The exact amount to collect within 30 days is COGS (cost of goods sold, which can include services) plus cost of getting the customer. The cash collected in the first 30 days must exceed COGS + customer acquisition cost. Once this occurs, after acquiring and delivering to the customer, their payment covers all costs, allowing you to acquire another customer. This is why pulling cash forward is magical. For manufacturing, margins differ due to COGS, but prefer 80% gross margins; for human services, target 80% or higher.
Most businesses can't get big because they fill a leaky bucket. Acquiring customers is hard work; losing them requires repeating the process, which is exhausting. > "You don't want to be in the sales business, you want to be in the reselling business." (John Paul DeJoria)
Get customers to buy again and again, driven by product primarily and brand secondarily. Keeping customers makes a business more valuable and fun to run. Small business owners often scale too fast before figuring out revenue retention and churn. Good B2B benchmark: above 80% annual retention. Example: Start with 100 customers Jan 1, 2025; by Jan 1, 2026, retain at least 80 of the original 100, regardless of growth (e.g., even at 160 total, check the original cohort).
Reverse engineer lifetime value from annual retention. If $100/year with 50% retention, LTV = $100 / 50% = $200. With 80% retention (losing 20%/year), get ~5 turns, LTV ~$500. CAC is commoditized across similar businesses (e.g., social media agencies). High retention creates arbitrage: spend more on acquisition since customers are worth 5-100x more. Target these numbers; if not met, fix before scaling to avoid bigger problems.
Prepaying prevents churn (e.g., annual prepay locks them in) and provides cash today to acquire more customers. Offer at least 10% discount for full prepay, as money today is worth at least 10% more (e.g., invest in stock market). Benchmarks:
- Buy 10 get 2 free: 15-20% prepay.
- Moderate discount + bonuses (faster delivery, less risk, easier): 30-40% prepay.
Bonuses: skip the line, dedicated concierge vs. group, double guarantee length. Third-party financing (e.g., Affirm): 35% increase in overall sales, pulls cash forward, enables buyers who couldn't otherwise afford it. Caveat: won't save a bad business (e.g., bad restaurant food spreads faster). Payment structures:
- Sell durations (e.g., 3/6/12 months), offer prepay perks (guarantee, priority, concierge).
- Split: half now, half in 30 days (even for longer terms; ask for cash now).
- Third payment if needed.
- Align payments with payday (wage earners) or cash flush dates (businesses).
- Don't coordinate payments with delivery.
Layaway (from 1930s Depression): Pay now, get product after full payment. Incentivizes fast payoff, easier collections (no delivery yet), builds anticipation. Example: Selling $25K enterprise SaaS onboarding to agencies. Client wanted $2K/month over year; countered with layaway—set onboarding a year out. They chose half now, half in a month. Benefits: faster payments, no delivery risk, customer anticipation (personal story: saved summer for Oakley X-Men Cyclops sunglasses, anticipation > product).
- In-person service from metal leads: close 10% of leads (100 leads → 10 sales).
- Cold webinar leads (broad market): 2-3% conversion (webinar opt-ins to sales); niched: up to 5%.
- Salespeople (in-person/home): 35% close rate (1/3 prospects). If higher, raise price; if lower, fix process first.
- Web pages: 1-2% conversion.
- Trust platforms boost: School about pages ~4%; Amazon book page (e.g., Offers) ~25% (1/4 clicks buy), but lower profit (10x conversion, 1/3 gross profit → 3x money).
Industry averages are dumb. Example: Average American is in debt, divorced twice, overweight—why benchmark against that? Hating competition yet measuring by their averages ensures mediocrity. Ignore averages; play to win. Tiger Woods clip: Young at Masters, says "I'm here to win"; interviewer says "You'll learn"; next year, Woods wins jacket. Enter industries as outsider, reject their reality. Quoting averages accepts no improvement. Winners aren't average; only rule is physics.
Example: Manufacturing net 70% margins possible (friend's complex machinery: $400K machine costs $17K via know-how). Business = black box transforming low-value inputs to higher-value outputs, advancing civilization.
These 12 rules of thumb (ratios, guideposts, lighthouses) have served well in scaling services businesses.
If customers are together and you create a community about your business with them, you make more money. Most businesses believe this, so starting a school is a good idea. School can also be a standalone business. Many use it as an online space for real-world groups like prayer groups, fantasy football leagues, sports teams, or WCK leagues to stay connected between meetings. It's a platform to build community with fun, easy, accessible features. It's free to be a user, but $9/month to host a group.
You're not getting what you want out of business or life because you want too many things simultaneously and refuse tradeoffs. Alex Rosie owns acquisition.com, a portfolio of companies with $250 million aggregate revenue last year. He broke the Guinness World Record for fastest-selling non-fiction book, selling 3.6 million copies in under three days for $106 million in sales. Success came from making tradeoffs, though some disagree with his choices— that's fine, as lives differ by preferences.
Everything has tradeoffs; determine price versus value. Critics focus only on cost, ignoring payout. If someone makes a trade you wouldn't, that's why you don't have to.
House Example of Impossible Tradeoffs
You can't have a house in a ski town near the beach, secluded yet with town, shopping, and walking distance, cozy but with lots of space, yard, and activities. Beach and snow mountains don't coexist; cozy conflicts with vast land; walking distance clashes with great aerial views. High-rise downtown might offer some, but trades are inevitable. Confronting this moves you forward; avoiding it leaves you in decision limbo or purgatory, achieving nothing.
Common Life Tradeoffs
Marriage vs. no marriage; kids vs. no kids; sacrifice 20s vs. 30s. Sacrificing 20s means missing youthful fun—that's real. Question: what are you trading for? Worst trades are unconscious ones, like missing 20s fun without building nest egg, reps, or experience for 30s. 30s reflect 20s choices. Some love backpacking Europe for cultural enrichment; Alex didn't choose that trade. He wanted a deep skill set for life. Travelers build skills, but are they as marketable? Examples like Zuck, Bill Gates, Elon didn't do that. Can't expect 1% outcomes without 1% tradeoffs.
Shoes Example
$500 shoes: decide if worth the trade. Critics call buyer idiot, but if billionaire, it makes sense; if on food stamps, probably not. Trades aren't inherently good/bad—context-dependent.
People struggle because they know certain loss but not upside. Fixed cost is guaranteed; upside uncertain, making self-bets hard. Key belief: you will figure it out if shit hits the fan. Worst case isn't as bad—most aren't homeless from failure but addiction/mental health. Vast majority of homelessness due to those issues. Even unhoused have food, medical access in US/developed world. Worst case: no boss, food, medical, freedom on streets—some prefer it.
Subjective well-being doesn't change dramatically; much inherited like dog breeding from wolves to Labradoodles—nice breeds nice, shit breeds shit, happy breeds happy (with genetic variation). Operate within genetic potential, like muscle from workouts. Brains evolved to find threats, keeping us stressed/unhappy to innovate. Downside not as bad, upside not as good as thought. Rewarded people embrace uncertainty.
Framing Trades
Quantify: lose these years, but won't regret due to return. Frame life happening for you, not to you—no regret if you believe you had to go through it. Hindsight regrets impossible without experience.
Be conscious of trades and what you're trading for. Critics aren't ahead: no fitter/richer/longer-married people criticize. Only sideliners with time do.
Personal Story: Overcoming Germaphobia
Up to eighth grade, Alex was a germaphobe—held breath near people, avoided doorknobs. Became debilitating. On Expedition 8 camping trip, committed to no handwashing, eating dirty for 5 days in woods. Survived, waited a week—no issues. Realized germ fears wasted energy. Maintained that view lifelong.
Others' opinions like germs: fear them killing you, but nothing happens. No one cares; play it out. Despite shots taken at him online (hit videos, out-of-context clips), nothing changes. Can't expect full understanding.
Ray Dalio Example
Old white guy on TikTok roasted as grifter despite being Ray Dalio ($30B net worth, 79, helping youth). Can't be legitimate to ignorant; hated by bad people is good. Judge character by enemy quality—ignorant hate is compliment.
Too many loud voices held Alex back; proved he'd survive. Germs don't kill; opinions don't either.
Biggest gains from unknown. Humans underestimate upside, overestimate downside (psychological bias from survival—optimists died eating berries). Upside in uncertainty/delay—arbitrage there. People avoid because unknown price/duration, but faster/less scary than thought. Take first step.
Applies at scale: acquisition.com taking huge bets, figuring it out. Others did it; so can you—not different tissue. Solvable; pay with money/favors/relations. Keep trying unless dead. Jolic quote: all failure besides death is psychological. Didn't die? Try again. Fear "what if doesn't work?" vs. "what if does?"—failure changes nothing, success everything.
This is the exact process used to learn anything very fast for the past 14 years in business. Recently broke the Guinness World Record for fastest selling non-fiction book, generating $106 million in sales in less than three days. If everyone is moving ahead faster, you might not be as smart as you think. Bad news: you might not be as smart as you think. Good news: it's under your control to change quickly.
Learning is same condition, new behavior. Example: knock and open door, person says "Hi, this is Alex." Instruct to say "Welcome to Starbucks" next time. Same knock, new response: "Welcome to Starbucks." The number of times it takes to change behavior in the same condition dictates intelligence.
Intelligence is speed of learning—it's a rate. Described as "quick," "picks things up fast."
- Fewer iterations to change behavior.
- Or, if more iterations needed, speed them up (e.g., 7 iterations in one day vs. one per week). This makes you smarter on a timeline basis.
Two vectors: iteration count and speed of iterations.
Personal story: At Vanderbilt (top 5-7 US school), felt below average intelligence. Worked 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily (library, class, cafeteria, gym only). Did 10 iterations faster than others' 3, moving ahead faster.
Skill: chain of adapted behaviors (multiple same condition, new behavior chained together).
Skills chunked up or down. Basketball includes dribbling, shooting, passing—subskills. Business: marketing, sales, product, hiring—subskills.
Generalizable skills across domains (e.g., hand-eye coordination helps shooting basketball, ping pong, tennis serve). Specific skills do not generalize (e.g., basketball shooting not to chess, but closer to beer pong or foul shots).
Language matters: "Good at business" is bucketed; chunk down to quantifiable behaviors (e.g., marketing is adaptive chain).
Reading, writing, speaking are generalizable skills applying everywhere. Learning itself is a skill.
Break down into smaller constituent parts for understandable units to change behavior.
Identify specific behaviors/actions demonstrating mastery of each subskill. Get clear on what good looks like in practice.
Example: Foul shots—measure:
- Percentage of shots hitting within box.
- Within hoop.
- In altogether.
- Follow through above head?
- Shoulder position (twisted, straight, squared)?
Sounds complex—welcome to winning. Think like a child: learning plasticity decreases, but skill at learning improves by being specific.
Quantify highly. Track everything worth learning—if not tracking, you don't care. No tracking = no knowing if improving.
Ignore narratives around psychology, emotions, biomolecular explanations. Focus on observable inputs/outputs, not magic inside the box.
Inputs provide feedback loops. Suck inefficiently for reps: get bad → tweak → less bad → repeat 100 times → good.
Do more initially without obsessing on why. Narratives scratch psychological itch, don't help.
Analogy: Sales issue blamed on "mother didn't hug enough"—irrelevant. Tennis pro fixes wrong grip by showing correct grip, not exploring emotional reasons.
Ignore mysticism, NLP, subconscious—focus on mouth/body actions: send this email, say these words, move body this way, voice like this, head up, stare straight.
Razor: If can't tell what to do with mouth/body, not clear directions.
Observe like scientist: no emotional context.
- Output: smile. Inputs: shook hand on entry, smiled, body posture (contract traps/midback to stand straight).
- Higher compliance likelihood.
"He bought because emotional trigger"—observe buy/no buy. Manage variables before outcome.
Measure outputs or never improve. Track.
Look at top 10%/1%: observe what they do, not say. Most good people don't know why good (e.g., Michael Jordan GOAT player, poor coach—doing vs. teaching different skills).
Personal: Struggled socially, observed "why are they cool?" Different outcomes → different behaviors.
Observe only physical plane (even if believe in more, manifest separately).
Replicate top 1%/10%—you'll suck initially (missing micro-steps). Example: Good vs. bad Instagram reel—use views/likes if can't delineate why.
Replicate observables. Shift to first-party data: high volume → analyze own top 10% vs. rest.
Example: AI training (interview with Amjad Masad, Replit CEO/founder): clean data good/bad. Real-world faster (drove off road, honk feedback, correct).
Do volume reps → find top 10% differences (1-2 initially) → new reps → more inferences → observation density increases like coats of paint.
Key: observation—differences between current/ideal. Analyze without meaning (autistic lens).
- Nods when other talks → more influence. Nod + interject: "Sounds good. Tell me more."
- Step back when asking → higher compliance.
Naturals: unconsciously observed/rewarded (e.g., toddlers model rewarded behaviors; testimonials = modeling).
Step 6: Analyze and Iterate
Top 10% people → batch 1. Own top 10% → observational differences → repeat like coats of paint.
Repetition is father of skill. Repeat until called natural.
Personal: Good at school, treated business like curriculum—learned lingo, how it worked. Confusion from same things different words.
Primary learning now: first-party. Do lots → more of what worked → repeat → share process.
New fields: hire experts to start at their iteration 9 as 1, then beat them faster.
Speed of iteration/improvement most important long-term. Rate of growth beats starting point—fastest improving team wins.
Master process: observe objectively differences (videos, salespeople).
Reemphasize: Ignore black box, no why except reinforcement/punishment. Saved time—people don't know own why.
If asked why you did X/Y/Z, can't consciously answer; just reinforced noise.
People are reinforced for responding to questions, but truth is irrelevant. Experts with great outcomes may teach inaccurately because their responses are automatic, rewarded by praise like "intelligent" or "smart." Example: Responding "I'm good" to "What's up?" is automatic, regardless of actual state. Similarly, repeated answers to "How did you become successful?" get reinforced without verifying accuracy.
"It's better to fail and know why you failed than to succeed and not know why." — Professor Bergman, Stanford
Failing with understanding allows course correction; succeeding without knowing why prevents recreation. Avoid attributing success to luck—assume better performers did something different. 99 out of 100 times, they've done things you haven't. Calling someone lucky doesn't improve you and may reflect your observational shortcomings.
Remove luck from your lexicon. Luck exists (e.g., genetics for muscle gain/fat loss), but don't let it stop effort—you work harder with worse cards. Everyone dies; future generations forget achievements. Focus on who you become, not what you get. Luck robs winners of full growth potential by skipping the gauntlet.
Anecdote: At 20-21, bought Powerball ticket (~$1B jackpot). Felt terror at winning because it would prevent proving self-reliance. Relieved not to win, as it preserved personal growth.
Favorite Magic card: Burning Wish—wished for weapon, not skill to wield it. Winning $1B lottery gives potential energy hard to comprehend: $1K to $1M difference equals $1M to $1B; 1,000 seconds (~14 min) to 1M seconds (~11.5 days) to 1B seconds (~30 years).
State facts and tell the truth. Story: Agency owner felt imposter syndrome selling appointments after failing at his own agency. Advice: He sucked at delivery/retention but excelled at acquisition—own it in marketing. Honesty eliminates imposter feelings and boosts sales/authenticity. No one argues facts: you did it or didn't. Deficiencies make you compelling.
Keep going—you're young. Focus on feedback loops to improve. Exceptional people stack skills: e.g., Charli D'Amelio (pretty, great dancer, humble, social media savvy). One skill isn't enough; master 3-4 that compound.
Avoid big capital expenditures pre-sale—pencil it out for buyer.
Ideal starter: no inventory, easy acquisition (door-knocking, calls, emails). B2B/B2C viable (e.g., car wash, lawn mowing at 16). Trust inherent locally; national requires marketing skill, content, proof (personal/customer success). Start local with zero capital, leverage profits to scale.
Software not inherently valuable—high gross margins, high revenue retention, viral growth make it so. Bad SaaS (poor metrics) < good service business (simpler ops, no dev team).
- Spend more on Google search (e.g., "toothache near me").
- Partnerships with triage/urgent care.
- Maximize utilization: 12-hour days, full bays, faster turnaround, triage high $ per hour jobs.
- Prefer fixed-price problem-solving over hourly (solve fast for more jobs/unit time).
- Nail current location (growth, retention, referrals) before expanding.
- Acquire failing shops (seller-financed, 15-20 year earnouts as annuity for retiring owners—low cash outlay).
Advertise: reach out, run ads, barber content, affiliate barber communities (white-label, commissions). Don't quit after one failure—persist.
Sell outcomes, not software: more time, efficiency, higher charges, better margins, improved team/leads. Tie CRM deficiencies to their pains.
Advertise. Like booster packs (Magic, Pokémon) or Amazon mystery boxes (pay $30-40, get $80-120 value). People gamble for upside. Observe behavior over complaints—lottery losers buy again.
You're good at something monetizable, even if not obvious. Generalize skills (read, write, speak, type, learn fast). Learn what others want faster than them. If not good at what people buy—learn it.
Owner: Florida Panhandle landscape design/construction. $1.5M revenue/$300K net last year; $2.2M/$400K this year. 1 main crew (7 members) + 5 subs. $300K cash. Goal: $50M+ enterprise value, multiple divisions. Bottlenecks: recruiting, ops, big bets (property, crews, marketing).
To 20x: Target ~$8M EBITDA (6-6.5x multiple for $50M value).
Current revenue: $400k. Goal: $50 million enterprise value requires ~$44 million topline (20x current). Short-term focus on constraint: owner's time trapped in operations (1-3 million "swamp" phase). Owner handles all decisions, fires, limited to 20 hours/week on marketing/sales. Close rate: 30%. Confident could hit $10 million+ focusing solely on marketing/sales.
Sales Process
- 60-70% leads from organic search/social.
- Inbound form → in-person consultation.
- Services: full refreshes to $150k+ landscape design/renovation.
- Two-part close: walk property, design, present proposal with numbers.
- Social content: 3 posts/day on Instagram.
Key Improvements: VSSLs
Missing two VSLs (video sales letters):
- Between appointment set and showing up.
- Between first and second appointment.
"That might be the single largest influence on your close rate." Expect: boost close rate to 50-60%, increase prices 25-35%, more than double profit. Frees cash to hire help.
Talent Constraint
- Top crew leader: handles main/complex projects, helps small ones, oversees subs. Spread thin. Currently $75k.
- Needs: $60k crew leader to promote him to full-time project manager (20 hours/month ops/cost focus).
Two-Step Plan
- Create two VSLs (takes 1 day).
- Hire crew leader via ads/outreach (easier than replacing main guy).
"Make $340k so you can get the time back to double revenue." Frees 20+ hours/week for owner to scale sales/marketing. Even without VSL upside, hit $340k profit to fund talent.
Capital Allocation
Of projected $340k profit:
- $60k to talent (increases capacity).
- Save rest for future constraints (trucks/equipment ~$150k later). Always allocate capital to constraint (now talent, next crews/mowers).
Enterprise Value Play (6-12 Months)
Current: smash-and-grab projects, minimal repeat/word-of-mouth. Add recurring revenue for higher multiple.
- Use big projects ($75k backyard redo) as customer acquisition/price anchor.
- Follow with maintenance ($800/month mowing).
"They'd rather have the guys who know where all the pipes are." Prioritize: get owner time back first, then expand model or add recurring.
Lead Sources
- Google search crushes (intention-based, 30%+ conversion minimum).
- Meta/FB ads colder (10% conversion, interruption).
- Different sales motions per source.
- Continue organic content (1,000 pieces created, gaining traction/branding). "And, not an or."
- Jump from GM at national roofing P-corp to own operation: Jump when ready. You're never ready. Argue why being older increases success odds.
$8.7M TTM revenue, $1.2-2M profit. Brothers own:
- Handbags: $5M revenue, $210k profit (national online).
- Pawn (gold/silver/jewelry/luxury watches): $3.75M revenue, $900k profit (1 primary location, 2 buying locations). In late sale process: LOI/APA signed, awaiting SBA lender approval.
Employee Theft Dilemma
Caught replaceable employee skimming (small amount, but hit to financials/ops). Already confronted, met middle ground, no money back, changed moving forward.
Advice: Fire and Disclose
"Ruin the company. When you're 85 looking back, you're going to want to have been honest."
- Exposes liability: reps/warranties flip if known issue hidden.
- Frame to buyer: "Good news: slightly more profitable, honor price. Bad news: replace skimmer."
- Be upfront with full facts/truth.
Ozark Story Analogy
Drug lord catches grocery store cashier (beloved Lupita) pocketing $5. Tests reactions:
- Secretary: "Just $5."
- Another: Contextualizes.
- Marty: "Get rid of her. It's not the first time she stole; first time caught."
"I would not want a snake in my business. Whether $100 or $10k." Signal to team/self: zero tolerance.
Handling in Sale
- Inherited culture allowed skimming; pushback on changes.
- Long game: defend reputation with life. Future deals reference past buyers.
- Full disclosure script to buyer:
"Paul pocketed $200. Big internal debate. Good news: small amount. Bad news: let him go. Profit may rise removing cancer. At minimum, know you're dealing with integrity." Buyers respect it. Half-truths sink deals; full truth builds trust. "This is a values question more than a business question." "You will always be proud of how you acted." Business solid: LOI proves it; can relist higher if falls through.
Media buyers leaving to build own: Compensate better + pod structure (4-person teams vs. solo). Harder for team to leave with clients. Structural > pay alone.
Business ethics: Act proud looking back. Right thing reinforces itself.
Jordan's agency: Helps Gulf clinics (Saudi/UAE, Arabic-speaking patients) with elective procedures (plastic surgery, dental, etc.). $300k revenue, $150k take-home. Struggling: small market, cold outreach (Instantly/Apollo) exhausts lists fast (150 cosmetic surgeons, 200-300 dentists). Hard to hit 100 actions/day.
In 2012, started an agency doing Arabic SEO, the only one in the market. Lived in the Middle East for four years and tried out the skill. Worked well until a couple years ago when competition increased. Niching down to medical clients, focusing on elective procedures like clinics in a developing market, struggling with market size. Can get leads, but retention is an issue.
Many clients retain and stick around, though some pause during slow periods. Annual revenue retention is about 50% churn every year.
Two main issues: 1) Dealing with very small businesses leads to structural churn due to their volatility translating to agency volatility. 2) No reliable way to acquire clients. Outreach is one way, but running ads for elective procedures could work better using Andromeda for specific targeting while keeping it open. Examples: campaigns for dental cosmetics, ocular facial, pure facial, noses, necks, boob jobs—one for each surgeon type. More than 150 of each exist; tens of millions of people in the area. Issues with wealth, but ads should outperform outbound since not enough leads are being generated.
Cold outreach isn't bad, but lacks scale after years of effort. Run ads as next step. Niche down super tight. Consider opening to US market, not just Arabic. Try ads first.
Struggle with small client budgets; compared to cheap local freelancers ("I could hire five for your price."). Downside: reverse market arbitrage—living in America selling to non-Americans. Ideal: live in Indonesia, sell to Americans. Consider US-based to avoid issues; with 12 years experience, market where buying power is highest.
Less competition in Middle East due to hyperfocus, but if really good (and agency is), go where competition is—that's where the pie is. If not good, niche to tiny pond first. As skills improve, expand to bigger ocean as a bigger shark. May have leveled up—compete and win.
Left job, jumping into uncertainty. Goal: personal training. Using creative agency skills to sustain while paying for fitness business course—no ROI yet. Might need to buy five more courses or go through all online ones. Fundamentally believe there's a way to get fitness customers; just lack the skill, and someone has it.
Analogy: Bridge with bricks. First course adds first three bricks—not a waste, just needs more. Second adds next three, third completes it—then revenue flows across. Don't call arithmetic a scam because it doesn't teach calculus; arithmetic is foundational.
Issue in alternative education: not products, but promises. Charlatans exist, but most try to help, limited by teaching skill. Of 10 skills needed, a course might teach 1, 3, 7 well. Those with prior 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 succeed and post testimonials. Reframe: learn everything from everyone—combine to outperform them all.
Don't learn wrong lesson from no ROI ("this doesn't work"). Keep dreams and goals; try again.
If you're really good, you want to go where the competition is because that's where all the pie is.
Just win.
Keep Alex Hormozi in your library
Save the videos and channels worth coming back to, and find them again in one place.
