I Paid Off My 2.875% Mortgage…Dave Ramsey Was Right

Name: I Paid Off My 2.875% Mortgage…Dave Ramsey Was Right
Uploaded: 2026-09-09T20:00:15.000Z
Duration: 16 min 3 s
Channel: Graham Stephan

Graham StephanSeptember 9, 202616m

Topics10

Rethinking Low Interest Rate Debt0:00 Early Financial Philosophy1:31 Credit History Rejection2:31 Credit Score Optimization3:30 The Inflation Argument5:00 Policy Genius Sponsorship6:31 The Mental Weight of Debt8:00 Peace of Mind vs Mathematical Optimization10:30 Cash Buffer Importance12:30 Personal Evolution and Advice13:32

In a Nutshell

The speaker paid off 2.875%–3.6% mortgages despite the math favoring arbitrage, because the unexpected mental relief from being debt-free outweighed the lost 4–5% spread. Research and personal experience showed debt elimination reduces anxiety and improves decision-making regardless of interest rate or account size. The new advice prioritizes cash buffers, 401k matches, and high-interest debt first, then treats mortgage payoff as a personal peace-of-mind choice once those are covered.

AI-Generated Notes

These notes were generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies.

The speaker is taking a significant risk by going against everything previously said about debt. After years of advising against paying off low interest rate debt and instead arbitraging money in markets, the speaker now questions that position. Mathematically, it makes sense not to pay off a 3% mortgage since stock market returns exceed that rate, and below a certain point it functions like free money. However, after paying off three super low interest rate mortgages, an unexpected sense of relief emerged that had never been anticipated.

A Twitter poll asking if anyone regretted paying off their low interest rate mortgage received almost 4 million views and 1,500 replies, with almost nobody expressing regret. This prompted the speaker to examine the non-mathematical aspects of being debt-free that calculators cannot capture.

Growing up, the speaker was taught that all forms of debt were bad. Credit cards were considered traps, loans were for people who couldn't afford things, and purchases should only be made with cash. This philosophy meant no credit cards or payments, only a basic debit card and savings account.

At age 21, after working as a real estate agent for four years and saving commissions, the speaker wanted to buy real estate in 2011 when homes were under $100,000. The choice was between buying one house outright or using $100,000 as a down payment for three properties, leveraging the spread between mortgage rates and property returns.

The speaker was denied a loan not due to insufficient funds or inability to afford payments, but purely because of no credit history. This experience flipped the entire philosophy on debt. Credit and debt became viewed as tools to be used rather than avoided, capable of generating millions of dollars when used strategically.

At 21, instead of buying three houses at $60,000 each in cash, the speaker could have purchased 12 properties with 25% down. Those properties would have appreciated to approximately eight times their original value. The key principle identified was the spread: borrowing at 5% to invest at 12% creates 7% return on money that was never originally owned.

After recognizing debt's potential, the speaker spent years opening credit cards and using every available method to boost credit score. This led to mortgage approvals, including a first mortgage on an $800,000 West Los Angeles property at 3.375% for 30 years, followed by a duplex at 3.5% and another at 3.6%.

Sign in to read the full notes

Get access to AI-generated notes, topic timestamps, and more.

I Paid Off My 2.875% Mortgage…Dave Ramsey Was Right

Rethinking Low Interest Rate Debt00:00

Early Financial Philosophy01:31

Sign in to read the full notes