Paris Burns as the Great Replacement Reaches Its Inevitable Conclusion
In a Nutshell
Paris is burning and European cities are rapidly becoming non-white due to mass migration from Africa and the Middle East, with census data showing dramatic demographic replacement: Brussels from 95% European in 1955 to 21% today, London from 97% to 36%, and similar shifts across Amsterdam, Berlin, Vienna, Stockholm, and Malmö. The US has undergone parallel transformation with no majority-white cities over 1 million people remaining, all driven by government policy without democratic consent, while China, India, and Israel maintain ethnostates. This replacement was engineered by elites who inverted moral accountability—those who notice it are labeled racist—while simultaneously importing cheap labor through H-1B and OPT programs that displace American workers and depress wages, creating conditions for social chaos.
These notes were generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies.
The riots in Paris began as organized protests involving multiple groups including France's largest labor union. The protests were against France's education system and broader economic conditions, occurring simultaneously across Europe in countries including Italy, Belgium, Serbia, and Albania.
European economies feature wealth concentrated among older generations with diminishing wealth held by young people. Approximately 30% of France's education budget goes to retired teachers' pensions rather than current education needs. In the United States, people born between 1946 and 1965 hold the majority of household wealth, while people under 40 hold only 6.5% of total household wealth. The median age for first-time home buying in the US is 40.
A poll of American boomers found that 89% would support higher taxes on young people to maintain their Social Security benefits. Every US president since 1992 except Joe Biden has been a boomer. The median home buying age has moved to 40 due to wealth concentration in older generations.
French intelligence services are highly effective, having assassinated targets including sinking the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior in Auckland Harbor in 1985. France seized Telegram CEO Pavle Durov at an airport and held him for over a year. Despite this capability, authorities did not intervene when half a million protesters gathered in central Paris while President Emmanuel Macron attended a Celine Dion concert.
Paris has experienced significant demographic change through mass migration from sub-Saharan Africa due to French-speaking populations from former colonies. The French government banned racial counting within France's borders in 1978, coinciding with increased immigration. France admits hundreds of thousands of immigrants annually, many from sub-Saharan Africa.
While some attribute Paris unrest to Muslim immigration from North African colonies, sub-Saharan African migration is also significant due to French language connections. Paris differs from other European cities with its large sub-Saharan African population. The speaker notes that importing populations from dangerous, chaotic regions may replicate those conditions when the numbers are large enough.
Charles de Gaulle stated in 1959: "It is very good that there are yellow Frenchmen, black Frenchmen, brown Frenchmen. They prove that France is open to all races and that she is a universal mission. All right. But it is good on condition that they remain a small minority. Otherwise, France would no longer be France. We are after all primarily a European people of the white race, Greek and Latin culture and the Christian religion."
The leader of the French left has stated he doesn't want France to be French but would rather it be Creole, embracing demographic change rather than opposing it.
French political discourse openly describes the demographic transformation of historic France as the great replacement, a term considered verboten in the United States where it is labeled a racist or anti-semitic conspiracy theory. The concept refers to the intentional demographic shift in white-majority countries becoming non-white, which is not organic but deliberately engineered.
A consistent pattern in modern discourse inverts moral responsibility: those who note crimes like genocide in Gaza become the criminals, while the perpetrators remain unaccountable. The same applies to demographic replacement, where noting the process against the will of existing populations violates democratic principles.
Once a country's population changes, the new majority will claim the country including its culture and history. This reflects the human desire for continuity between ancestors, current life, and future generations - the reason people visit ancestral graves rather than cremate remains. History provides roots in something larger than individual existence.
Power is measured by who controls history - who assembles facts and draws lessons from the past. Those who control history control the present. Cultural change becomes evident when history is destroyed, such as mobs tearing down statues or torching historic buildings.
A town hall in Limar, France dating to the 1800s was deliberately set ablaze by a mob protesting school funding. Police cars were also torched, and officers were overwhelmed. The attack occurred despite marriages being celebrated in the building hours earlier. Local residents expressed shock and fear at the desecration.
Torching historic buildings represents an intentional act of desecration to erase the past for a new future defined by immigrant populations. This constitutes an act of war foreshadowing a Europe that no longer belongs to the people whose ancestors built it.
Statistical evidence from European cities shows dramatic demographic shifts:
- Brussels, Belgium: 1955 was 95% European, now 21% European
- London: 1955 was 97% English/European/white, now 36%
- Amsterdam: 1955 was 98%, now 40% minority
- Berlin: 1955 was 98%, now 57%
- Vienna: 1955 was 95%, now 51%
- Stockholm, Sweden: 1955 was 97% Swedish, now 65%
- Malmö, Sweden: Now minority Swedish
This population replacement has occurred only in majority white countries, with no equivalent changes in Africa, Asia, or the Middle East. At current rates, within current lifetimes there will not be a single white majority nation other than Russia, assuming Russia survives current conflicts.
Iceland, settled by Vikings a thousand years ago with one of the world's most homogeneous populations, now struggles with unwanted immigration. The country's jail population reflects this change, transforming a previously orderly, homogeneous, prosperous nation.
Diversity is promoted exclusively for white countries, while China remains 99% Han Chinese, India remains all Indian, and Burkina Faso remains all African. The United Nations, Soros organizations, and Democratic Party apply diversity pressure only to white nations.
Israel fights wars over demographics, seeking to maintain a country filled with people like themselves. This represents the opposite approach from the diversity requirements imposed on white countries.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded to French riots by immediately referencing Hamas and stating that Macron called him on October 7th about a ceasefire. Netanyahu claimed Hamas is like ISIS and warned that failure to destroy Hamas would result in seeing them "on the streets of Paris."
Netanyahu's response to Paris burning showed satisfaction rather than sympathy. Similar reactions occurred when North African invasion of Spain accelerated, with comments that Europeans "deserve it" for criticizing Israeli actions in Gaza.
Mass migration causes tribalism as people retreat to ethnic groups when no working majority exists. Americans over 50 who grew up outside major cities typically did not identify by ethnicity but simply as American, with tribalism not being the defining characteristic of American life.
Leading universities maintain reading lists calling for killing white people, including books like "White Fragility" and "White Rage." Professor Jonathan Metzl of Vanderbilt University authored "Dying of Whiteness: How the Politics of Racial Resentment is Killing America's Heartland," attributing heartland problems to whiteness rather than factors like the Sackler family's opioid distribution or job offshoring.
The ADL defends academics promoting anti-white ideology and attacks critics as haters, enforcing inverted rules where pointing out hate becomes hate itself.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer stated that America's future depends on welcoming immigrants and dreamers, with the goal of providing citizenship paths for 11 million undocumented immigrants rather than addressing native population concerns.
The emerging coalition represents deep hostility toward the people who live here, not just a lack of caring or ignoring. This involves mocking people as they die using their money.
The census is taken every 10 years as mandated in the Constitution. The framers understood that who lives within a country's borders is the single most important fact about any country. People are always the most important variable in any equation. The census numbers are federal numbers available on the internet.
If reaching a place where the ADL slanders you and you may get debanked by JP Morgan Chase for reading federal census numbers, then something unhealthy is going on.
In 1955, New York City was 90% white. Today, it's 31% white. Chicago was 85% white and today is 32% white. Los Angeles in 1955 was 93% white and today is 28% white. The three biggest cities in the United States are overwhelmingly non-white. There is not a single city in the United States that has a white majority anymore. Not one city over a million is majority white. The biggest city in the United States that's still majority white is Boise, Idaho, at approximately 280,000 people.
The three biggest states by population - California, Texas, and Florida - are all majority non-white. California is approximately 32% white, Texas is in the 40s. These three states together contain about 100 million people out of a country of 350 million.
There was never a referendum on these demographic changes. Whenever people have been allowed to vote on immigration, they overwhelmingly vote against it. This includes not just white people but also non-white people who don't want new waves of immigrants. All of this was imposed on the American population against its will.
France is approximately 13% foreign-born. The United States official number is 16%, though could be way higher. There are tens of millions of people here illegally, mostly from third world countries. Australia is about 32% foreign-born. Canada will soon be non-white in its majority.
This demographic change happened with the complicity of governments. None of this was imposed on any of these governments by force. The leaders of every white country in the world other than Russia played along with this.
The post-war consensus after World War II appears to be that majority white countries are a threat to the world and inherently immoral. Therefore, they need to be eliminated. The result of that is Paris.
There is a kind of boomer mindlessness about these changes, a belief that everything will be fine because it always is. This extends to the current president, the man who was elected twice on the promise to shut the borders and deport non-Americans living here, who is now telling us we need more foreigners in a country that has changed beyond recognition in the past 50 years.
Donald Trump has stated he has always been in favor of students coming in from other countries, including China, with 500,000 Chinese students coming in. He believes this is good for schools and good for the country. He is also in favor of having them stay. The point is made that whether they are great people, they are not American people, and America has too many people here who are not American people.
Marrying the economic stagnation of the boomer economy, where only people at the very top seem to be doing well and are hoarding money, with mass migration causes society to be inherently chaotic. The churn prevents any kind of national identity from developing. Combining these two things leads people to start burning things down and destroys countries.
China has demographic problems due to the one child policy, with an aging population. Despite this, China gives out only a thousand or two green cards per year and no one is naturalized into Chinese citizenship. China's immigration rate is zero. China has the largest economy in the world and over the past 30 years the fastest growth rate.
The ADL does not have a problem with China's immigration policy. Chuck Schumer does not have a problem with China's, India's, or Israel's policies, which are all to some extent ethnostates. It's only when white countries think about returning to the status quo of 60 years ago that alarms go off.
Aristotle wrote in his treatise Politics 2,300 years ago: "A lack of common dissent is also a cause of revolution as long as the citizens do not share a similar outlook. For a state does not emerge out of a random population nor from a chance period of time. It's not organic. It doesn't just happen by accident. People come together with people with whom they share fundamental characteristics and beliefs. Hence, those states who have admitted resident aliens and settlers from abroad have mostly succumbed to factional strife."
H-1B visas existed as early as the 1950s for supposedly special or particularly meritorious immigrants. In 1990, the H-1B program was created for specialty occupations where the American market supposedly cannot produce enough workers. Originally envisioned for tech skills, mechanical engineering, and IT development skills.
When the H-1B program started, caps were much smaller at around 20,000 annually, then expanded to 40,000. Currently at 85,000 a year plus another 45,000 to 60,000 through cap-exempt universities, nonprofit research institutions, and government-affiliated research institutes. The overall population of people here on H-1B visas is estimated to be north of 700,000 people.
Over the history of the H-1B program since 1990, more than 3 million people have been on those visas. This creates a generation of displacement affecting family formation for Americans, the ability to move into middle management, and get good salaries that would allow houses in the suburbs and kids in soccer.
In 1924, the United States ended immigration after decades of historically high levels, mostly from Eastern and Southern Europe. The pressure to stop immigration came from labor unions because immigration was understood as a tool employers used to depress wages through supply and demand.
About a year ago, one in every 17 FHA-backed mortgages issued in the country was to someone here on temporary status. This administration has stopped that and taken it down to zero as of May or March 2025.
The American people are waking up to the recognition that they're going to have to put Americans first. The term racist doesn't keep people quiet as much anymore. The business community needs to read the room as the restrictionist movement continues.
The new justification for continuing H-1B is that it's needed for tech and is a national security question, claiming the country will get nuked unless Silicon Valley is supplied with H-1Bs from India.
Microsoft has been suspended from the PERM program, which allows recommending workers for green cards, as has Adobe. There have been investigations coming forward under Project Firewall announced by the Department of Labor.
Owning a home has always been the core of the American dream and the asset that families work their lives to build, a place of stability, security, and actual wealth. Too many homeowners are stuck swiping credit cards to cover groceries and paying a survival tax of 20% interest or more. American Financing helps homeowners tap into their hard-earned equity and saves its customers an average of $800 a month, nearly $10,000 a year. It is not just a loan but a total financial reset. Find out more at 800-685-5569 or visit americanfinancing.net/tucker.
H-1B admittance into the country is not taking jobs that Americans cannot do. The H-1B program is administered at levels 1 through 4 within occupations, with 4 being the highest tied to skill and responsibility. The vast majority of H-1B applications are at the bottom two layers of the experience route. The example of an American accountant making $60,000 a year being replaced by an Indian accountant making $45,000 a year shows the program is largely concentrated at the lower ends of the wage scale. The idea that those were skill sets that could not be replicated in America has revealed itself as fiction. Every program that eventually succumbs to institutional capture over time becomes a function of labor depression and a way to keep wages low.
The PERM program is where workers move to green cards. The requirement is that employers prove they tried to hire Americans, but that is not really happening. Companies put ads in ethnic newspapers, but the purpose of the system is to get foreign labor to service cheap labor for companies. The check is not well manufactured because it would defeat the purpose of the program. The average H-1B worker makes $19,000 less than an American doing a comparable job according to one recent statistic, while other studies say it is about $10,000 less. The program is concentrated at the lower end of the labor scale for jobs that are not specialty positions, and workers are paid less despite prevailing wage rules, undercutting the ability of Americans to advocate for increases. These are not nuclear engineers being imported.
If a business owner wants to import people on visas, they can apply for as many H-1B visas as they want. The program issues 85,000 a year. Existing H-1B holders can transfer to a new employer without counting against the cap. Employers want to bring these people on as a supply chain of cheap foreign labor.
The supply chain of foreign labor starts at the university level with curricular practical training. This is the right for a student on an F-1 visa to work in the United States while an undergrad. The program is extremely corrupt. Universities advertise this ability to eventually work as part of the way they get students here. The employer hires the foreign student with no visa issued, just a status as a subfunction of the F-1. The employer does not pay FICA taxes of 7.65% on that student, making them immediately cheaper than hiring an American student. The foreign student does not pay FICA taxes, so they take home more of their paycheck than the American student working next to them. The university gets to charge full freight tuition to the foreign student. Universities have become addicted to this revenue. The FICA tax is often higher than income taxes for people at the low end of the labor scale.
The reason the program exists is because Congress is bought by interests addicted to cheap labor. Every incentive points at the program continuing because the university benefits, the foreign student benefits, and the company benefits. There is no institution in American life more corrupt than the universities. They are like the medieval church.
Universities get J-1 visas, which are exchange visas, to bring over postdocs and researchers. They can underpay these individuals with no pretense of a prevailing wage or hiring an American. The J-1 program has none of these controls built in. The curricular practical training program for undergrad labor has no pretense that employers had to hire an American or pay a prevailing wage. Universities are as ruthless as any private equity firm caricature and have moved away from serving the American people.
Optional practical training is for people who have graduated. Students on CPT who graduate can work for 12 months with no visa issued. STEM graduates get a 24-month extension. They are still not paying FICA taxes. There are about 2 million college graduates every year. In the last calendar year, 290,000 foreign graduates were authorized to work in the United States through OPT registrations, competing against American graduates.
The whole point of universities was to exist as the engine of advancement for ambitious smart Americans. The GI Bill and the postwar meritocracy used standardized testing to identify smart ambitious people, funnel them into universities, and have them work their way up the ladder to manage the country. That was all a lie. Young men understand that universities have no stake in their future and will hate them. It is not just an attitude but encoded in admission standards. It is Jim Crow at scale but with the federal government backing it this time.
The OPT program is not prescribed in statute but exists via DHS regulation. A $100,000 fee was imposed last year via presidential proclamation for H-1B but was struck down. The OPT fee is being proposed now through the formal notice and comment program. For every OPT issued, the university, not the employer, will have to pay $70,000. For the 24-month STEM extension, it is another $30,000. If the fee cannot be collected due to lawsuit or injunction, it will harm the ability to administer the program given the risk of fraud, and the administration will retain the right to kill the entire OPT program.
Photographs of the University of Texas at Austin showed that a lot of the people in the picture were not from the United States. People questioned why a public university supported with tax dollars was filled with people who are not from the United States. The answer was shut up racist. These universities were built for Americans. Universities have endowments that insulate them from real pressure and are not taxed.
Young Republicans in Texas and Knoxville understand that universities are no longer for them and they will have to build from scratch. The tech bro model of starting your own thing feels devoid of meaning to a lot of them. The culture of dividing people by race began in undergraduate years at places like Penn State, where someone would say of course you would think that way because you are a white male. The realignment is at the beginning where people are waking up to corruption they tolerated for 30 years. The old incentive structures are still exerting influence. The 2024 election was a big tent, and there are inherent pressures built into that.
Fears about AI ending humanity are coming from the people creating AI. The biggest companies are all in on AI, but AI does not produce much revenue yet. The hope is that AI will be the great driver of revenue in the American economy. That money is effectively the future of American young people who will not have jobs. AI is a labor-saving technology. It does not make sense to import anybody on H-1B or any other visa with AI looming. Brandon Gill is introducing an H-1B reform bill in Congress along with Crane, Self, and Chip Roy. It does not go far enough but is the first major thing in many years.
The American people are waking up and saying they will either be put first or displaced. There is no longer an in-between. There will be mass deportation or mass importation. There is no longer a third option. Political opponents are committed to the wholesale industrial importation of people into the country.
H-1B visas are for three years and always get extended, then most of the time get turned into PERM and a green card application. A $100,000 fee was imposed for new H-1B visas via presidential proclamation, currently blocked by the courts. Only 700 positions were filled under this fee in the last cap season. A wage weighted lottery system was also initiated. Level one workers must be paid at the 17th percentile of that occupation. All the outsourcers were at the lower end of the wage scale.
The administration modified the H-1B visa lottery system by weighting applications according to job specialization levels. Level one positions received one lottery entry, level two received two entries, level three received three entries, and level four received four entries. This approach shifted the distribution toward level three and level four positions by approximately 20 to 30 percent, reducing displacement of American workers in non-specialized roles.
A $100,000 fee was introduced for H-1B applications, which significantly impacted outsourcing companies. Cognizant experienced a 100% decline in H-1B applications during cap season, while Tata Consultancy Services saw a 97% decline. The fee structure made it unprofitable for companies to bring in lower-end foreign labor, effectively discouraging exploitation of the lower end of the labor market.
Despite the fee implementation, the 85,000 annual H-1B cap was still filled primarily through the OPT program. Graduates already present in the United States on F-1 visas could transfer to H-1B status, serving as the main feeder mechanism for filling positions. The administration estimated the H-1B program costs federal agencies approximately $8 to $8.8 billion annually to administer.
A new fee structure was proposed through the notice and comment period, charging companies $103,000 for every H-1B visa awarded. This fee would apply not only to new entrants but also to individuals already in the country through the student visa pathway, including OPT recipients. The calculation divides the program's administrative costs by the 85,000 annual cap.
The argument was made that while the current administration is working within existing statutory boundaries to limit H-1B usage, the program itself remains problematic. The statute states the government "shall issue up to the cap," creating a legal obligation to award visas. The broader point emphasized that legal immigration reform is still within the scope of normal politics, whereas illegal immigration enforcement has moved beyond traditional political boundaries.
The discussion addressed the need to potentially defy court orders regarding illegal immigration enforcement, noting that Barack Obama established precedents with DACA and DAPA programs. The argument was presented that illegal immigration has become clearly within the purview of executive authority for immigration enforcement.
H-1B visa holders can switch between employers, which contributes to the program's structure being characterized as designed to provide companies with cheap foreign labor. The overall H-1B and OPT population in the United States is estimated at approximately 700,000 to over 1 million people, with OPT alone accounting for 290,000 individuals.
The presence of this foreign labor pool depresses wages across the board, not only affecting individual software developers who may be laid off and forced to train their replacements. The system creates a permanent competition dynamic that impacts American workers at multiple skill levels.
The reliance on foreign-educated workers, particularly from India for STEM positions, removes incentives to improve American educational institutions. Rich liberal communities have largely abandoned advocacy for domestic school improvement because they can import educated workers from other countries rather than invest in American students.
Chuck Schumer explicitly stated the need to bring in foreign workers because certain communities are not having enough children, using an economic argument similar to France's position. This approach prioritizes importing labor over implementing policies that would encourage family formation among existing citizens.
A significant portion of the American population, particularly elites, has embraced a post-nationalist mindset that prioritizes global interests over fellow citizens. This represents a fundamental shift where nationalism itself is viewed negatively, and allegiance is cast with foreigners rather than domestic populations.
The current approach to immigration and labor markets is characterized as unsustainable, with modern life elements serving as coping mechanisms rather than genuine solutions. The elite offer no vision of a beautiful future and do not attempt to promise improved conditions for average Americans.
The failure of political systems to respond to citizen concerns about immigration is creating conditions for increased radicalization. The 2024 election represented a clear mandate for immigration enforcement that, if not delivered upon, could trigger a legitimacy crisis for government institutions.
Sanctuary city policies represent decades of defiance against federal immigration law. Historical precedent from 1957, when Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to enforce Brown v. Board of Education, demonstrates that federal law must be enforced uniformly or the concept of national sovereignty becomes meaningless.
The phrase "replacement theory" was discussed as no longer theoretical given census data showing demographic changes. The Ugandan-born mayor of New York City calling for an end to federal immigration enforcement in the largest American city demonstrates that replacement dynamics are operational rather than theoretical.
Approximately 3 million outstanding asylum cases exist with six-year court dates and work permits already issued. If Democratic leadership returns to power, these cases are unlikely to be adjudicated, effectively granting permanent status through administrative non-enforcement.
Illegal immigrants are being granted rights traditionally reserved for citizens, including the ability to serve as police officers and deputy sheriffs in Illinois. This creates a parallel rights regime that blurs the distinction between legal and illegal status, fundamentally altering the meaning of citizenship.
A proposal was presented to hire 250,000 people to form a civilian deportation corps following the midterms. This would supplement existing DHS capacity, which cannot handle the scale of removals needed independently. The approach would involve bringing American citizens into the enforcement process through logistics support and direct communication with individuals subject to removal.
While worksite enforcement would remove job incentives for illegal immigrants, it would not be sufficient alone because individuals could still access state, county, and nonprofit benefits. The economic pull factors from countries like Sierra Leone or Haiti would remain stronger than reduced federal benefits alone.
Physical removal of millions of people is considered unavoidable given the scale of illegal immigration. The approach requires building both physical infrastructure and public support, with the argument that if 250,000 Americans are unwilling to participate in enforcement efforts, the political sustainability of such measures would be questionable.
ICE has accomplished significant work at scale with hardworking personnel working until 10 p.m. every night dealing with threats and vitriol. Public support for deportation initially went down but then stabilized and has remained relatively steady or slightly higher. The argument is that the DHS-alone approach cannot be the only face of the effort, and instead requires a civic effort that enlists Americans physically into the process.
Massive organized violent efforts prevented ICE operations, funded not by grassroots support from Americans but by a small number of rich people committed to the status quo, specifically the Soros NGO world. This represents a criminal enterprise thwarting federal law with no arrests of those funding the obstruction, just as there was never one arrest of anyone who funded the destruction of the Midwest during the BLM riots. This situation differs from drug cartels or mafia organizations hurting the country, yet no effort has been made to hold these groups accountable.
What happened in Minneapolis was the single largest anti-federal uprising in decades, described as the largest since the Civil War since Fort Sumter. The country does not yet know how to process this information. A significant number of American people still think Minneapolis events were treated as protests. The distinction is that protesters do not stalk federal agents at airports, feed their license plate information to local PD sources, go to their hotels to break windows, and then threaten their wives on Facebook.
The DOJ exists to deal with such organized criminal activity but ignored it. The violence did not come from rich white housewives feeling sorry for illegals, but from organized groups paid to fly in from outside the state to stalk ICE agents at airport Marriotts.
Anti-ICE violence began in 2013-2014 with people physically preventing federal law enforcement, including chaining themselves to bus tires taking people to detention facilities. This pattern continued through Occupy, BLM, and 2024 protests blocking roads to JFK. The reality is that one of the two major political parties has a street arm, and the right does not understand how to apply power in the same capacity.
The violence comes from organized paid militia with discoverable leadership and funding structures. Just as RICO statutes ended heroin trade, prostitution, and loan sharking in New York by taking down the five mafia families, the same approach should apply here. The FBI figured out where organized criminal activity was coming from and took them out, but no similar effort has been made against groups obstructing immigration enforcement.
When the next Democrat wins, they will avoid images of caravans and instead fly people in directly. Americans sleeping on linoleum floors at Logan Airport and NGO volunteers escorting illegal aliens through lines while citizens waited demonstrate the challenge. The question is whether Americans will physically challenge these people or form human chains around them.
The only approach that maintains government legitimacy is to marshal the state aggressively and enforce the law. This requires hiring a couple hundred thousand people to go to all 630 commercial way stations, post offices, and build the 50-city infrastructure that Joe Biden built to mass import people at industrial scale. The proof that capacity can exist is demonstrated when the will is there.
The Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930s hired 277,500 people in four months, with General Douglas MacArthur running it as the largest mobilization in American history. The same model could be applied to immigration enforcement, mobilizing underemployed young men and women to a significant cause.
The country has 49,000 commercial or charter buses, the civil reserve air fleet, DoD planes, and logistics capability with people around the country who can deploy those skill sets. The tougher challenge is making contact with illegal aliens. Even if ICE achieves 3,000 arrests per day converted to removals, that would only account for 30% of who Joe Biden brought in over four years.
Civilian contact can include notifying people they are known, asking them to exercise their right to self-removal, and sending certified mail requiring signatures. At some point, greater force will be needed for enforcement contact at scale. Deputization through DOJ does not confer immigration enforcement authority, and DHS can only deputize existing federal employees.
An incoming Democratic president would view a quarter million Americans enforcing federal immigration law as an army on the streets not loyal to them. They already tell ICE that it is an invading army, illegitimate and lawless. January 6 prosecutions of over a thousand people, including elderly diabetic grandmothers, demonstrate how they would feel about a quarter million young people on the streets.
January 6 killed any semblance of a right-wing street movement, protests, or mass gatherings. The legitimate mechanisms of the federal government can be used instead, employing a couple hundred thousand young men and women to a significant cause.
The 287G program extension bringing sheriffs into immigration enforcement accounts for under a thousand arrests per day, maybe 500. Mass deportation in the millions requires an entirely different enterprise. There are two years left, and extension of current capability will not achieve the required scale.
H-1B should be cancelled and an immigration moratorium called for. A rule under White House review would require companies to advertise jobs to Americans first before advertising to foreigners on LinkedIn or Indeed. For H-1B, there would no longer be deference to extensions, requiring brand new investigations examining recent company layoffs. Equal opportunity law would be used to sue companies discriminating against national origin if they only have H-1B workers.
Mass deportation in the millions is the litmus test for any Republican at county, state, or national level. Handing over 3 million unadjudicated asylum cases, the majority coached under Joe Biden, is a non-starter.
The transformation of the American population between 2020 and 2024 was the most consequential policy decision in a very long time. The motive was deliberate social and demographic engineering at industrial scale, including drowning children in the Rio Grande and handing off kids to sponsors they barely knew.
The political project depends on wholescale social and demographic engineering because opponents believe in a different or alien form of government. When electoral college problems were raised after Bush's 2000 win, and proportional representation issues emerged when legislation failed, the innovation was to change who gets to decide in the first place.
Opponents reject national sovereignty and move people from the poorest countries rather than South Korea. International communism's goal for a hundred years is the global nature of the system, rejecting national sovereignty. A New York City mayor who is explicitly DSA and revolutionary, born in Uganda, can win despite polls showing native New Yorkers largely against him.
The same old foes represent socialist globalism that rejects sovereignty. Glenn Beck and Mark Levin warned about globalists years ago before joining that side. The Kyoto protocols in Nigeria were rejected. Politics is now crude between foreign tin socialism or federal law and national sovereignty prevailing.
American sovereignty has been pierced, and the job now is to figure out if it can be put back together and paint a realistic path forward. Bringing many people into the national mobilization effort is necessary because treating them as bystanders will result in failure.
Federal government can communicate more effectively at scale about the cost of current policies and what will be required for deportation or remigration, which will be mainstreamed in the US and Europe. Legal aliens can be texted directly, and billboards can provide specific information like Guatemala City flights on Tuesdays and Thursdays at noon from Houston airports.
Federal agencies that flooded the country with illegal aliens under Biden were built by Bush, with DHS specifically built by a Republican president. What gets built can be used by people with different programs. Building data centers and digital control grids without brakes could be used by the next administration to surveil and control opponents.
Cameras are great because they're to prevent child abduction. The argument is that the basic amount of information available to any firm bidding on internet advertising or to a credit agency should be used for illegal aliens who are not subject to the same protections as American citizens. When background checks are done for tenants, three major companies process those commercial data that can be bought and reach the vast majority of the illegal alien population who aren't in the shadows. This approach would use federal power as aggressively as Democrats built a 50 city infrastructure.
The CHNV program for Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela was justified as an emergency at the border, resulting in 30,000 people being flown in per month. This scale gets close to or is a little under a single month of best removals by ICE, which may have been closer to 40,000. New York City in 2023 had about 215 migrant shelters operating, with stories about homeless people being displaced because these shelters were taking on illegal aliens. Hotels that tourists stayed in were taken over. At one point in 2023, more people were in New York City migrant shelters at a single point than ICE has had in its custody at any given point in the past two years.
The scale at which Democrats were willing to wield power with courts rubber stamping it all is something not being approached yet. The question is where the pioneering legal strategies like CHNV exist for immigration, where the bold proposal is, and where the function of logistics at scale will get millions of people out. The federal government is capable of it since they just did it in the reverse direction four years ago.
The mechanisms that were built, the legal innovations, when opponents come back in power they will have them. The sole metric that will be most impactful for the American people is whether millions of people were removed. This will impact every other element of the quality of life discussion. Politics are inherently moving toward preventing people from coming to this country and physically removing those who are here, as the former doesn't survive without the latter.
There are two waves of populism: one on the right that has showed at times in fits and starts that it can capture a multi-class, multi-racial coalition, versus one on the left moving into explicit socialism and revolution. One involves continuing to bring in millions of foreigners to displace American workers and one doesn't. The right-wing version might have a chance to win. The political program is moving towards an era where Americans need to prevent people from coming and physically remove those here.
The original restrictionist movement was blue collar Democrats because they were the ones hurt by immigration. Factory owners were for it, factory workers opposed it. The question is whether any such constituency exists in the Democratic party now. The realignment will include bringing a bunch of those folks over. Bernie Sanders was against immigration. 80% of the immigration policy is Barack Obama 2008 or Bernie Sanders 2003.
The way to knife through the emerging coalition of socialism is to peel off people who recognize there will be one side that puts Americans first. We're in the process of that happening and building this out. We can split people off because there's no reason the AOC, Mandani kind of rich kid who went to Bowdoin variety of socialism, which is really just globalism, should prevail. If you're going to have leftwing politics, at least it should be pro-American politics.
We've seen pro-American leftwing politics before. The reason the globalist version prevails is because they have abandoned the working class and find them distasteful. The argument is simpler: we're at the beginning of marshalling this pro-American coalition, and there is explicitly a pro-foreign one. Lindsey Graham and others actually agree on the basic issues despite a lot of pretending.
Shaking off the consensus that has been talked about for 10 years is happening. The work has to be continued. When going back to DC, friends presume the argument is won, but there's still work to carry it forward. The opposite of becoming unvigilant is literally foreign tin socialism. When we articulate that we're going to put American workers first, you cannot lose that.
The business class or tech guys need to read the room. They've gotten away with things when Amazon employees were urinating in bottles at their workstations, but there's time for things to swing back. We're in a pitch battle between the business class and the working class element. The business class is going to lose this one. It's inevitable. All politics are trending in this direction. The American people are moving towards demanding that they're put first. Their great well of well-being for foreigners is running out. Victory is coming.
I see that we will be victorious.
I think so. I really believe it. I have to.
Keep Tucker Carlson in your library
Save the videos and channels worth coming back to, and find them again in one place.
