The Biggest Myth About the Menstrual Cycle | Dr. Lauren Colenso-Semple & Dr. Andy Galpin
In a Nutshell
The menstrual cycle myth of a universal 28-day length with ovulation on day 14 is false, as cycle lengths and ovulation timing vary widely between women and even within the same woman across cycles. Individual patterns cannot be predicted from cycle length alone and require direct testing via LH urine strips, ultrasound, or progesterone measurements to determine. This extreme variability makes standardized research on women prohibitively expensive and complex, creating barriers that have historically excluded female participants from studies.
These notes were generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies.
The common belief that the menstrual cycle is always 28 days with ovulation always occurring on the fourteenth day is incorrect. The widely recognized graph showing standardized hormonal fluctuations is rarely observed in reality.
Cycle lengths vary significantly between women and can even vary within the same woman across different cycles. A 21-day cycle is normal for some individuals, while a 35-day cycle is normal for others. When discussing ovulation, which divides the cycle into phases, some women ovulate early while others ovulate late, creating stages of unequal length.
Research participants have demonstrated extreme variation in ovulation timing. One participant had a 30-day cycle with regular ovulation on day 9. Another participant had a 30-day cycle with regular ovulation on day 19. These patterns cannot be determined without direct examination through multiple cycles of ovulation tracking and testing for estradiol, progesterone, and luteinizing hormone.
Hormonal patterns and timing are highly variable across individuals. When hormones are plotted on graphs, some show small peaks while others show large peaks. This variation applies to both timing and magnitude of fluctuations. There is no consistency between different hormones - a smaller estradiol peak does not correlate with a smaller progesterone peak. The patterns are completely random and cannot be predicted.
Due to this variability, general advice such as "Do this, you're at that stage" is not accurate because individual cycle stages cannot be determined without testing. The assumption that cycle length correlates with ovulation timing - shorter cycles meaning earlier ovulation, longer cycles meaning later ovulation - is not always true.
Menstruation is easily identified, and cycle lengths within a three to four day window are considered normal and healthy. However, ovulation timing (early, late, or intermittent) requires specific testing methods.
Ovulation Testing Methods
- Luteinizing hormone urine strips: Reactive urine strips measure luteinizing hormone, which rises just before ovulation. These are commonly available as ovulation test kits at pharmacies.
- Ultrasound imaging: The gold standard for confirming ovulation, specifically vaginal ultrasound.
- Progesterone measurement: Measuring progesterone levels in the middle of the luteal phase can confirm ovulation. Absence of a progesterone peak indicates an anovulatory cycle.
For shorter cycles, testing should begin on day 10 and continue daily. For longer cycles, testing may start later. However, luteinizing hormone spikes do not guarantee complete ovulation - incomplete ovulation can occur despite the hormone spike.
A range of three to four days in cycle length is considered regular. Greater variation may indicate irregularity requiring further investigation.
Multiple combinations of cycle characteristics exist:
- Fixed cycle length with consistent ovulation day
- Fixed cycle length with inconsistent ovulation day
- Inconsistent cycle length with consistent ovulation timeframe
- Inconsistent cycle length with inconsistent ovulation timing
Conducting menstrual cycle research faces significant barriers. Journals often reject papers that do not control for menstrual cycle phases or standardize hormone levels. Scientists historically avoided female research because controlling for menstrual cycles requires extensive resources.
Proper research methodology requires:
- Tracking cycles across multiple months
- Measuring hormone levels throughout the cycle
- Standardizing testing timing to specific cycle phases
- Recruiting only participants with regular menstrual cycles
- Excluding participants taking oral contraceptives
These requirements create substantial barriers for research labs with limited resources. Studies on women require significantly more time and funding compared to studies on men. A vertical jump study on women would require bringing participants in months in advance for ovulation tracking, blood sampling, and hormone assessments, then scheduling each participant according to their individual menstrual cycle phases.
These barriers make including women in studies nearly impossible despite the desire for more female-specific research. The requirements not only prevent women-specific health research but also make general study participation by women extremely difficult.
Keep Andy Galpin in your library
Save the videos and channels worth coming back to, and find them again in one place.
