The Great Carb Con: Scientists Break Down a Shocking New Study
These notes were generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies.
No athlete's health should ever be sacrificed at the altar of performance. Not like six plates of pasta. There was something in those studies that was ignored: you have this willpower and you're trying to wring all the metabolic juices out of your muscles and just push yourself. More reliable than any other biomarker that you can look at. This really brings a new meaning to mind over matter. And that's how we got to where we are on sports nutrition guidelines. 4,000 calories from just carbs alone. You can have your cake and eat it too.
Myth: You should eat carbs for peak performance. As an ex-marathon runner, host always lived by this mantra, maybe with confirmation bias because of love for Nutella, candy, and marshmallows. People accept it due to inertia of status quo, not rigorous challenge. Dr. Andrew Cutnik recently challenged this with a meta-analysis of randomized control trials showing you don't need to carb load for peak performance.
Dr. Andrew Cutnik is a leading researcher in metabolic health, especially blood sugar control and diabetes. He approaches scientific research and communication with ferocity and integrity.
New paper: Meta-analysis of over 100 years of evidence, 600 citations, analyzing over 160 sports performance studies. Goal: Understand if carbohydrates improve sports performance and the underlying metabolism. Findings starkly contrast current sports nutrition guidelines.
Sign in to read the full notes
Get access to AI-generated notes, topic timestamps, and more.